The Real Reason Your Team Can't Communicate (And It's Not What You Think)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Pexels | Medium | Elephant Journal | Docker Hub

Three weeks ago, I watched a project manager spend forty-seven minutes explaining to her team why their quarterly targets were slipping, and not one person in that room understood what she actually wanted them to do differently. Not one. I know because I asked them afterwards during the coffee break, and they all looked at me like I'd asked them to explain quantum physics using only interpretive dance.

This is the problem with workplace communication training in Australia today. Everyone thinks it's about speaking clearly and writing better emails. Wrong. Dead wrong.

The Myth That's Killing Your Productivity

Here's what nobody wants to admit: most communication problems aren't communication problems at all. They're thinking problems disguised as talking problems. I've been running workplace communication training sessions for over sixteen years now, and I reckon 73% of the issues I see could be solved if people just stopped and figured out what they actually meant before opening their mouths.

But here's the controversial bit - sometimes bad communication is actually good business.

Hear me out. When that marketing manager sends those rambling emails that nobody reads? She's protecting herself from accountability. When the operations team uses jargon that makes no sense to the sales team? They're maintaining their expertise monopoly. When the CEO speaks in management-speak platitudes? He's avoiding making any commitments that might come back to bite him.

Smart, right? Annoying as hell, but smart.

Why Traditional Communication Training Fails

Most communication courses teach you to be a better version of yourself. Active listening. Clear messaging. Empathy. All lovely stuff. All completely useless if you're dealing with people who don't want to be understood.

I learned this the hard way back in 2018 when I spent three months developing what I thought was the perfect communication workshop for a mining company in Perth. Beautiful content. Interactive exercises. Role-playing scenarios. The works.

First session, the site supervisor looks at me and says, "Mate, this is all well and good, but how do I tell the boys their overtime's been cut without starting a riot?" That's when I realised I'd been teaching people how to arrange deck chairs on the Titanic.

Real workplace communication isn't about perfection. It's about survival.

The Three Types of Workplace Communicators

Over the years, I've noticed people fall into three categories:

The Broadcasters - These are your extroverts who think communication means talking louder and more often. They're the ones who schedule meetings to plan meetings and send follow-up emails about their follow-up emails. Exhausting but usually harmless.

The Receivers - Brilliant listeners who nod along to everything and then go away and do exactly what they were going to do anyway. They've perfected the art of agreeing without committing. Dangerous in large numbers.

The Translators - The rare ones who can take complex ideas and make them simple, or take simple ideas and make them sound important depending on the audience. These people are worth their weight in gold and usually end up running companies.

Most training programs try to turn everyone into Translators. Waste of time. Better to work with what you've got and teach people to recognise which type they're dealing with.

What Actually Works (Spoiler: It's Not What You Expect)

Forget the corporate speak for a minute. Want to know what really improves workplace communication? Shared frustration.

Nothing brings a team together like collectively complaining about the new software system that doesn't work, or the client who changes their mind every week, or the air conditioning that's either arctic or tropical with no middle ground. When people bond over mutual annoyance, they start talking honestly. And honest communication, even when it's messy, beats polite nonsense every time.

I've seen employee communication training sessions transform teams not because they learned to speak better, but because they finally had permission to admit what wasn't working.

The second thing that works? Consequences that matter. People communicate beautifully when their bonus depends on it, or when the project deadline is real, or when the client is actually paying attention. Amazing how articulate someone becomes when there's skin in the game.

The Australian Factor

We've got a particular challenge here in Australia because we've imported American communication styles without importing American directness. We say "perhaps we might consider" when we mean "absolutely not," and we pepper everything with so many qualifiers that by the time we get to the point, everyone's forgotten what we were talking about.

I worked with a team in Adelaide once where they spent six months having "conversations about having conversations" before anyone actually said what they meant. Six months! The project could have been finished twice over.

Compare that to a Brisbane construction crew I trained last year. They communicated through a combination of technical drawings, hand gestures, and creative profanity that would make a sailor blush. Crude? Absolutely. Effective? You bet. Zero misunderstandings, project finished ahead of schedule.

The Technology Trap

Everyone thinks technology will save us. Slack will organise our conversations. Zoom will bring us together. Project management software will keep us on track.

Rubbish.

Technology amplifies whatever communication habits you already have. If you're unclear in person, you'll be unclear in writing. If you avoid difficult conversations face-to-face, you'll avoid them on video calls too. If you're the type who speaks without thinking, congratulations - now you can send messages without thinking too.

I've watched teams waste entire afternoons in Slack debates that could have been resolved with a five-minute phone call. I've seen important decisions buried in email threads longer than War and Peace. I've witnessed grown adults have public meltdowns in group chats because they couldn't figure out how to use the private message function.

The answer isn't better technology. It's better judgment about when to use it.

What Nobody Tells You About Listening

Active listening is the most oversold skill in the communication toolkit. Here's why: most people aren't looking for someone to listen to their problems. They're looking for someone to solve their problems, validate their feelings, or give them permission to do what they were going to do anyway.

"I hear what you're saying" is corporate-speak for "I'm going to ignore everything you just said but I want you to think I care." Real listening involves admitting when you don't understand, asking uncomfortable questions, and sometimes telling people things they don't want to hear.

The best communicator I know is a warehouse manager in Melbourne who responds to most requests with "What do you actually need from me, and when do you need it by?" Boom. Done. No fluff, no interpretation required, no room for misunderstanding.

The Meeting Menace

Let's talk about meetings for a minute. Ninety percent of workplace communication problems could be solved by having fewer meetings and making the remaining ones actually useful.

But here's the thing nobody wants to acknowledge: most meetings aren't about communication at all. They're about politics, relationship maintenance, and covering your backside. The actual decision-making happens in the corridor afterwards, or in the follow-up phone call, or sometimes not at all.

I once sat in a two-hour strategy meeting where the only concrete outcome was agreeing to have another meeting the following week. Two hours of my life I'll never get back, listening to people say nothing in increasingly creative ways.

Want better communication? Start by asking what outcome you're trying to achieve before you open your mouth. If you can't answer that question in one sentence, you're not ready to communicate yet.

The Feedback Fantasy

Performance reviews. Team feedback sessions. 360-degree evaluations. We've convinced ourselves that more feedback equals better communication.

Wrong again.

Most feedback is either so watered down it's meaningless ("you're doing great, keep it up") or so poorly delivered it does more harm than good ("you need to be more strategic in your approach"). People spend weeks crafting feedback that tells someone exactly what they already know about themselves.

Real feedback is immediate, specific, and actionable. "That presentation was confusing because you jumped between topics without explaining the connections" is infinitely more useful than "your communication style could be more engaging."

But here's the bit that'll annoy the HR department: sometimes the most valuable feedback is the kind that never gets said out loud. The raised eyebrow that tells you you've lost the room. The sudden interest in phones that means you're being boring. The way people start packing up before you've finished talking.

Why Perfect Communication Is Overrated

This might sound like heresy coming from someone who makes a living teaching communication skills, but perfect communication is overrated. Sometimes a bit of ambiguity is exactly what you need.

"We need to improve performance" can mean different things to different people, and that's not always a bad thing. Let the sales team interpret it as hitting targets, let operations think it's about efficiency, let HR focus on engagement. Everyone gets motivated to work on what matters most to them.

The problems start when you try to be so precise that you eliminate all room for interpretation. You end up with communications that are technically accurate but completely bloodless. Nobody remembers them, nobody acts on them, and nobody cares about them.

The Real Secret

After all these years, here's what I've learned: good workplace communication isn't about getting everyone to understand each other perfectly. It's about getting everyone to understand each other well enough to get the job done.

Some misunderstandings are actually productive. They force conversations that wouldn't have happened otherwise. They reveal assumptions that needed challenging. They create opportunities for innovation that nobody saw coming.

The goal isn't zero miscommunication. The goal is faster recovery when miscommunication happens.

And that, my friends, is why your team can't communicate. Not because they don't know how, but because they're trying to solve the wrong problem. Stop teaching people to be perfect communicators. Start teaching them to be resilient ones.

Because in the end, the teams that thrive aren't the ones who never misunderstand each other. They're the ones who figure it out quickly when they do.